Cases 61 - 70 of 204
Clayton #250554 v. Michigan Department of Corrections & Contractors et al
as 1:2016cv00830
Plaintiff:
Franklin Clayton #250554
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections & Contractors, Robert Napel, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raleem-X v. Brown et al
as 2:2016cv11899
Plaintiff:
Raleem-X
Defendant:
Larry Brown, T. Lee, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Antonio Davis v. Robert Napel
as 16-1567
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT NAPEL, Warden
Raleem-X v. Larry Brown, et al
as 16-1524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALEEM-X
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY L. BROWN, S.T.G. Coordinator, T. LEE, Sergeant, Corrections Officer, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director and others
Dion Cunningham v. Robert Napel
as 16-1484
Petitioner - Appellant:
DION CUNNINGHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT NAPEL, Warden
Cecil Hawkins, Jr. v. Steven Rivard
as 16-1406
Petitioner - Appellant:
CECIL R. HAWKINS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN RIVARD, Warden, also named as William Schuette, Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Robert Napel
Williams #221217 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams #221217
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Health Services, Bureau of Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresham #272603 v. Austin et al
as 2:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Pamela Austin, Unknown Lese, S. Eagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Napel et al
as 2:2016cv00037
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Robert Napel, Heidi Washington and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary #269436 v. Napel et al
as 2:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Bryan Allen Cary #269436
Defendant:
Robert Napel, Unknown Alexander, Unknown Huss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
