Cases 1 - 10 of 14
USA v. Rufus Kariuki
as 19-10080
Defendant / Appellant:
RUFUS KIMANGI KARIUKI, also known as Robert P. Johnson, also known as Mark Edward
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnson v. SHAC LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv01899
Defendant:
Anda Doe, Kala Doe and SHAC LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert P Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Johnson v. Gulfport Police Department
as 1:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Johnson, II
Defendant:
Gulfport Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Stokes
as 1:2015cv00166
Plaintiff:
Robert P Johnson
Defendant:
Casey Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Stokes
as 1:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert P Johnson
Defendant:
Casey Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toliver v. Troutman et al
as 1:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rasheen Raymond Toliver
Defendant:
Shirley Troutman, Michael Telesca, David J. Zack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOL Finance Company v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 11-2831
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LOL Finance Company
Defendant:
Robert P. Johnson, individually and doing business as Paul Johnson & Sons Cattle Co., Keri J. Maloley, individually and doing business as Paul Johnson & Sons Cattle Co., John Doe and others
Defendant - Appellant:
First National Bank of Omaha
LOL Finance Company v. Robert Johnson, et al
as 11-2654
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LOL Finance Company
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert P. Johnson, individually and doing business as Paul Johnson & Sons Cattle Co. and Paul Johnson & Sons Cattle Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Keri J. Maloley, individually and doing business as Paul Johnson & Sons Cattle Co., John Doe, ABC Company and others
LOL Finance Company v. Johnson et al
as 4:2009cv03224
Plaintiff:
LOL Finance Company
Defendant:
Robert P. Johnson and Keri J Maloley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
