Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Trustees of the Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund v. Russo
as 1:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Robert Russo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
BABAYOFF v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2023cv03644
Plaintiff:
YAIR ISRAEL BABAYOFF
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP, RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce v. Russo et al
as 2:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Natalie C. Bruce
Defendant:
Ernest Robert Russo, Jr., Daniel Bartlett, Kelly Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Russo v. United States of America
as 22-1869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Russo
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Russo v. Progressive Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
Robert Russo
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Russo v. Progressive Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv01408
Plaintiff:
Robert Russo
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pfundstein v. Home Depot USA et al
as 2:2021cv00340
Defendant:
Kenyon Kawa, J. Griffith, Ernest Robert Russo, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael John Pfundstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
James et al v. Russo et al
as 2:2021cv00287
Defendant:
Tim Tingey, Austin Stirland, Dan Bartlett and others
Plaintiff:
Raven James, Aaron James, Gabriel Pecoraro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
