Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01749
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Naturalization Hearing
HASHEMI et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01269
Plaintiff: SEYED HASHEMI, NEDA NIKBAKHT
Defendant: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
YANG v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01270
Plaintiff: ZHIYONG YANG
Defendant: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01232
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01143
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CUSUMANO v. GONZALEZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00971
Respondent: MICHAEL A. CANNON, ALBERTO GONZALEZ, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Petitioner: GIUSEPPE CUSUMANO
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00944
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Administrative Procedure Act
GORINA v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv00715
Defendant: PAUL NOVAK, DONALD MONICA, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Plaintiff: MARINA GORINA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Naturalization Hearing
ZHU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv00172
Defendant: ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Plaintiff: TONG ZHU
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AHMAD v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv00487
Defendant: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, CHRISTINA POULOS and others
Plaintiff: IMRAN AHMAD
Cause Of Action: Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?