Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv00097
Plaintiff:
GANWEI LU
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AL-MAZIADAWI v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00238
Plaintiff:
HUSSEIN F. AL-MAZIADAWI
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
KOVALENKO v. GONZALEZ et al
as 2:2007cv01153
Plaintiff:
OLENA KOVALENKO
Defendant:
EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AL-TAMIMI v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00209
Plaintiff:
MAJEED MOLSSON AL-TAMIMI
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
GUNDUZ v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2007cv00780
Plaintiff:
KADIR GUNDUZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
HOOSHYAR v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2007cv00647
Plaintiff:
DARYOUSH HOOSHYAR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ZHU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv00172
Plaintiff:
TONG ZHU
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ZHOU v. NOVAK et al
as 2:2007cv00010
Plaintiff:
XUHUI ZHOU
Defendant:
PAUL NOVAK, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
