Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
USMAN v. UPCHURCH et al
as 2:2008cv01443
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED HARIS UMER USMAN
Defendant:
EVELYN UPCHURCH, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SAEED et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01294
Plaintiff:
TAHIR SAEED, NAILA SAEED and DANYALL SAEED
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, MICHAEL L. AYTES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AUGUSTINE v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv01098
Petitioner:
BIJUMON K. AUGUSTINE
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LIAKHOVITSKI v. MUELLER et al
as 2:2008cv00422
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LIAKHOVITSKI
Defendant:
ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208
LU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv00097
Plaintiff:
GANWEI LU
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
UDDIN v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008mc00006
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD S. UDDIN
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Naturalization
SUNDARARAMAN v. MUKASEY et al
as 5:2008cv00196
Plaintiff:
BHARATH SUNDARARAMAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
