Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Spencer v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2017cv00835
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Keith Spencer
Defendant:
R. Bigelow, Angela F. Micklos, Clark A. Harms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andersen v. Crowther et al
as 2:2017cv00763
Plaintiff:
Kurtis Andersen
Defendant:
Scott Crowther, Bruce Young, Robert Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worthen v. Blanchard et al
as 2:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
Scott G. Worthen
Defendant:
Donald Blanchard, Curtis Gamer, Cheryl Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2014cv00333
Plaintiff:
Raymond Payne
Defendant:
Alfred Bigelow, Utah Board of Pardons, Clark A. Harms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2013cv00334
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Keith Spencer
Respondent:
R. Bigelow, Utah State Board of Pardons and Parole, Clark A. Harms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Todd v. Herbert et al
as 2:2012cv00483
Plaintiff:
Shayne E. Todd
Defendant:
Gary R. Herbert, Michael Leavitt, Jon M. Huntsman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarvis v. Harms et al
as 2:2011cv01051
Plaintiff:
Robert Jarvis
Defendant:
Clark A. Harms, Angela F. Micklos, Jesse Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston et al v. York et al
as 2:2011cv00674
Plaintiff:
Dale Livingston and Fred Brunsvik
Defendant:
Louise York, Ted Stewart, Lindsey LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Garner, et al
as 11-4047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY C. HOPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIS L. GARNER, UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE, as a sentencing entity, JESSE GALLEGOS and others
Alvillar v. Garner, et al
as 09-4223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUIDO JOHN ALVILLAR
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIS L. GARNER, Chairman of the Utah State Board of Pardons, JESSE GALLEGOS, Utah Board of Pardons member, CLARK A. HARMS, Utah Board of Pardons member and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
