Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gdovicak et al v. Tecklenburg et al
as 2:2021cv03137
Plaintiff:
Aaron Gdovicak, Alexander Glover, Andrew Lupisella and others
Defendant:
John H Tecklenburg and City of Charleston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sacco v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 7:2019cv00368
Plaintiff:
Robert Sacco
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB v. ML COUNTRY CLUB LLC et al
as 1:2019cv18245
Defendant:
GREEN VALLEY AT ML COUNTRY CLUB LLC, ML COUNTRY CLUB LLC, ROBERT C. SACCO and others
Plaintiff:
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, successor-by-merger to BENEFICIAL BANK and WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SACCO et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02668
Plaintiff:
MARY JO SACCO and ROBERT SACCO
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King et al v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv03319
Plaintiff:
Robert Sacco, Benjamin Fuliar, Mary Pounds and others
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. and Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trust One Payment Services, Inc. v. Global Sales Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01186
Plaintiff:
Trust One Payment Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Global Sales Solutions, LLC, Robert Sacco and Mark McCloskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Sacco v. Service Electric Cablevision
as 10-3902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT SACCO
Defendant - Appellee:
SERVICE ELECTRIC CABLEVISION, INC.
Sacco v. Service Electric Cablevision, Inc.
as 3:2010cv01120
Plaintiff:
Robert Sacco
Defendant:
Service Electric Cablevision, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
