Cases 1 - 10 of 18
John Doe v. University of Michigan, et al
as 22-1654
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE
Defendant / Appellant:
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, PAMELA HEATLIE and others
SELLERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66849
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SELLERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
John Doe v. University of Michigan, et al
as 20-1293
Defendant:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN and UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
Defendant / Appellant:
LAURA BLAKE JONES, PAMELA HEATLIE, SUZANNE MCFADDEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE
University of Michigan, et alIn re: University of Michigan, et al
as 20-1248
Petitioner:
E. ROYSTER HARPER, In re: UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, LAURA BLAKE JONES and others
Respondent:
JOHN DOE
SELLERS v. INCH
as 3:2019cv04936
Petitioner:
ROBERT SELLERS
Respondent:
MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones et al v. Jefferson County Board of Education et al
as 2:2019cv01821
Plaintiff:
Greater Birmingham Ministries, Traci Jones and Robert Sellers
Defendant:
Jefferson County Board of Education and Alan King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe v. David Baum, et al
as 19-2270
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN PRITZEL, BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, E. ROYSTER HARPER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv11451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. University of Michigan et al
as 2:2018cv11776
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
University of Michigan , Board of Regents of the University of Michigan , Pamela Heatlie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
