Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
C R BARD, Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barrett v. City of East Liverpool, et al.
as 4:2021cv01445
Plaintiff:
William Barrett
Defendant:
City of East Liverpool, East Liverpool Police Dept, Christopher Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00517
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. USA
as 2:2017cv00284
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carl Robert Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Duncan v. Smith et al
as 5:2015cv02204
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Marie Duncan
Defendant:
Robert Smith, Mike Volpe, Mark Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Ohio Supreme Court-Court of Claims et al
as 5:2015cv01845
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Marie Duncan
Defendant:
Ohio Supreme Court-Court of Claims, Brandon Harris, Mike Volpe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Duncan v. Ohio Supreme Court-Court of Claims et al
as 1:2015cv00579
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Marie Duncan
Defendant:
Ohio Supreme Court-Court of Claims, Brandon Harris, Mike Volpe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01929
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schneider et al v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01175
Plaintiff:
John E. Schneider , Andrew R. Bucher and Robert Smith
Defendant:
Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Smith v. Robbins & Myers Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
James Robert Smith
Defendant:
Robbins & Myers Inc, Peter C Wallace, Thomas P Loftis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
