Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Smyth v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv10497
Plaintiff:
Robert Smyth
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smyth v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv10990
Plaintiff:
Robert Smyth
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smyth v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv12275
Plaintiff:
Robert Smyth
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smyth v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 2:2020cv04247
Plaintiff:
Robert Smyth
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Smyth v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv11556
Plaintiff:
Robert Smyth
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Edward Bayliss v. Borough of Darby, et al
as 16-4347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES BAYLISS
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF DARBY, DARBY BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROBERT SMYTHE and others
CASSY v. BOROUGH OF DARBY et al
as 2:2016cv04585
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CASSY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF DARBY and ROBERT SMYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smyth v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv13693
Plaintiff:
Robert Smyth
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BAYLISS v. BOROUGH OF DARBY et al
as 2:2015cv05739
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JAMES BAYLISS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF DARBY , DARBY BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT , ROBERT SMYTHE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SESAY et al v. DARBY BOROUGH et al
as 2:2014cv05822
Plaintiff:
FATMATA SESAY and LUCY MORIBA-BROOKS
Defendant:
DARBY BOROUGH , ROBERT NEIL BARBOUR , DARRELL GUY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
