Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Umar Garvin v. Kevin Palmer, et al
as 19-3524
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN I. SCHULMAN, ROBERT STOCK, Police Officer, and Department, CHARLES RAMSEY, Chief of Police Philadelphia and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UMAR GARVIN
Defendant:
LYNNE ABRAHAM, District Attorney, and Office
STOCK et al v. MICHAEL LONG FARMS LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00115
Defendant:
MICHAEL LONG FARMS LLC and PHILLIP WINDERS
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STOCK and RETHA STOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Umar Garvin v. Kevin Palmer, et al
as 19-1147
Defendant:
LYNNE ABRAHAM, District Attorney and Office, CHARLES RAMSEY, District Attorney and Office, ROBERT STOCK, District Attorney and Office and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN I. SCHULMAN, CHARLES RAMSEY, Chief of Police Philadelphia, ROBERT STOCK, Police Officer and Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UMAR GARVIN
Stock v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2017cv03038
Defendant:
C.R. England, Inc. and Elias D. Rodriguez, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Robert Stock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Robert Stock et al v. Xerox Corporation
as 6:2016cv06256
Plaintiff:
Robert Stock and Martin Rifkin
Defendant:
Xerox Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robert Stock et al v. Xerox Corporation
as 8:2015cv01747
Plaintiff:
Robert Stock and Martin Rifkin
Defendant:
Xerox Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stocks et al v. Lowes Home Improvement Center et al
as 2:2015cv00381
Plaintiff:
Robert Stocks and Rebecca L Stocks
Defendant:
Lowes Home Improvement Center and Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STOCK v. CHEMRING ORDNANCE INC
as 4:2013cv00521
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STOCK
Defendant:
CHEMRING ORDNANCE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bartholomew v. Stephens et al
as 2:2012cv02657
Petitioner:
Wayne Bartholomew
Respondent:
D. R. Stephens, D. Hendrix, S. Culbertson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
