Cases 1 - 8 of 8
TESTA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38732
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TESTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TESTA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv01823
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TESTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Testa v. Becker
as 17-3891
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Robert Testa, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
Lawrence Becker, as plan administrator of the Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee Plan and Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee Plan, an Employee Pension Benefit Plan
Robert Testa v. Lawrence Becker
as 17-1985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Testa, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
Lawrence Becker, as plan administrator of the Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee Plan and Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee Plan, an Employee Pension Benefit Plan
Robert Testa v. Lawrence Becker
as 17-1826
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Robert Testa, an individual
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Lawrence Becker, as plan administrator of the Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee Plan and Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee Plan, an Employee Pension Benefit Plan
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Testa et al
as 4:2014cv00209
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Defendant:
Robert Testa and Sentry Select Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Robert Testa v. Lawrence Becker et al
as 6:2010cv06229
Plaintiff:
Robert Testa
Defendant:
Lawrence Becker and Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Robert Testa v. Lawrence Becker et al
as 2:2010cv00638
Defendant:
Lawrence Becker and Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee Plan
Plaintiff:
Robert Testa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
