Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Woodroffe v. Lincoln County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Defendant:
Lincoln County Jail, Sheriff Curtis Landers, Lt. Jamie Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodroffe v. Lincoln County Community Justice et al
as 6:2021cv01053
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Defendant:
Lincoln County Community Justice, Tony Campa, Susie O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00400
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Woodroffe v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2015cv02390
Defendant:
Victor Beerbower, Lt. Boston, Jill Curtis and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodroffe v. Kitzhaber et al
as 2:2013cv00403
Defendant:
Sgt. Alevera, Robert Alexander, Sgt. Bauer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodroffe v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2012cv00124
Defendant:
Cpl. Adamson, Walter M. Beglau, Brian Beleque and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodroffe v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2008cv00257
Petitioner:
Robert Woodroffe
Respondent:
Oregon Department of Corrections and Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodroffe v. Blacketter
as 3:2007cv00462
Petitioner:
Robert Woodroffe
Respondent:
Sharon Blacketter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodroffe v. State of Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision
as 6:2007cv00124
Petitioner:
Robert Woodroffe
Respondent:
State of Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
