Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Perez v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2025sf65682
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc. and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. f/k/a MonoSol RX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ortiz et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2025cv00544
Plaintiff:
Maria Idalia Ortiz and Roberto Perez Valadez
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Perez et al v. Rayborn et al
as 4:2025cv00155
Defendant:
MDR Construction, Inc. and Tanner Rayborn
Plaintiff:
Maria Perez and Roberto Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Accelerant Specialty Insurance Company et al v. Perez
as 0:2024cv62424
Plaintiff:
Texas Insurance Company, Accelerant Specialty Insurance Company and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Cover Note B507RN2300289
Defendant:
Roberto Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Perez v. All Potential Claimants
as 1:2024cv24042
Petitioner:
Roberto Perez
Claimant:
All Potential Claimants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jackson v. ProAmpac LLC
as 24-1961
Respondent:
AMPAC HOLDCO INC, also known as ProAmpac, AMPAC PAPER, LLC and PROAMPAC LLC, also known as ProAmpac
Petitioner:
NOEMY JACKSON, RAYMUNDO GALLARDO and ROBERTO PEREZ
Perez v. Rayford et al
as 9:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
J Rayford, J Hamilton, M McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Sells
as 24-40043
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Edward B. Sells, Assistant Warden, FNU Applewhite, Mayor and Dario Edwards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
