Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Johnson v. Day et al
as 1:2023cv02962
Plaintiff:
Maurice Albert Johnson
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day, Judge Peter J. Messitte, John Chamble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2019cv02569
Plaintiff:
MARCUS R. FREEMAN and MARCELLUS R. FREEMAN
Defendant:
REGGIE B. WALTON, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, CHANNING D. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Rosenstein
as 8:2019cv01753
Plaintiff:
Horace Linton Brown
Defendant:
Rod J. Rosenstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ryan White v. US
as 17-6750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN DARK WHITE, Name, as Attorney-In-Fact and representing the whole Class of Plaintiffs
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN D. ASHCROFT, Attorney General, ALBERTO GONZALEZ, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-7657
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jeffrey Cohen v. Rod Rosenstein
as 16-7313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY BRIAN COHEN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, US Attorney, HARRY MASON GRUBER, Asst. US Attorney and JOYCE KALLAM MCDONALD, Asst. US Attorney
Raymond Gill v. Julie Podlesni
as 16-6753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE DILLON PODLESNI, Office of the United States Attorney, PAUL E. BUDLOW, Lead Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, Assistant US Attorney and others
Gill v. Podlesni et al
as 1:2016cv01475
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
Julie D. Podlesni, Paul E. Budlow, Rod J. Rosenstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02957
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
