Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hurdsman v. Cozby et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent:
Jennifer Cozby and Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hurdsman v. Peters
as 1:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent:
Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hurdsman v. Peters
as 3:2023cv00780
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent:
Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hurdsman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00427
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Algoe v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2015cv01162
Plaintiff:
Randy Algoe
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Florida, City of Grand Prairie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. J Rayl Transport Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03122
Plaintiff:
Rodney Adams
Defendant:
J Rayl Transport Inc , Continental Tire The Americas LLC and Exel Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 3:2011cv03185
Plaintiff:
Ericka Adams and Rodney Adams
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, AAIPharma Inc, AAIPharma Services Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv02048
Plaintiff:
Rodney Adams
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Mark Starring and Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Smith County District Attorney's Office et al
as 6:2010cv00558
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alexander
Defendant:
Smith County District Attorney's Office, A D Clark, Dan Hurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
