Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Sheppard v. Duke
as 7:2022cv00089
Petitioner:
Rodney Sheppard, Jr.
Respondent:
Jordan Sandoval, Sheriff David Duke and Marty Cannedy's Secretary Ms. Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sheppard v. Lopez, et al
as 2:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
Rodney Sheppard
Defendant:
Emanuel Lopez, Unknown Sidi, Unknown Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppard v. Barnett et al
as 2:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Rodney Sheppard
Defendant:
B Barnett, Unknown Party, Centurion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppard v. Barnett et al
as 2:2021cv01505
Plaintiff:
Rodney Sheppard
Defendant:
Unknown Barnett and Unknown Anaya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Sheppard v. Arizona Department of Correcti, et al
as 21-15950
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REENTRY AND REHABILITATION, A. REYES, Corrections Officer, #9175 and SERRANO, Corrections Officer, #5205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY SHEPPARD
Sheppard v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al
as 2:2021cv00422
Defendant:
E Serrano, A Reyes and Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry
Plaintiff:
Rodney Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01264
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Rodney Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sheppard v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2019cv01478
Defendant:
Correctional Health, Unknown Buchannan, Paul Penzone and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard v. Walker et al
as 2:2019cv01514
Defendant:
Stephan Walker, Benjamin Ippel and Travin Janser
Plaintiff:
Rodney Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2018cv00435
Plaintiff:
Rodney Sheppard
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
