Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Roshell v. Washington et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Daryl G. Roshell
Defendant:
Alice Washington, Unknown Roe, Unknown Harold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roe v. Russell et al
as 3:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Antwine Roe
Defendant:
Jay Russell and Stacie Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roe v. Russell et al
as 2:2023cv06982
Plaintiff:
Comelius Antwine Roe and Cornelius Antwine Roe
Defendant:
Jay Russell and Stacie Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Havens v. Mills et al
as 2:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Bill Mills, John Gutierrez, Armando Chapa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantez v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maria Cervantez and Maria Concepcion Valenzuela Cervantez
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Cris Love, Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roe v. Tom Green County Detention Facility
as 6:2021cv00067
Petitioner:
Bannon D Roe
Respondent:
Tom Green County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01122
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roe v. Johnson County
as 21-10890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Roe
Defendant / Appellee:
Johnson County, Southwestern Correctional, L.L.C., doing business as LaSalle Corrections, L.L.C., doing business as Lasalle Southwest Corrections, LaSalle Management Company, L.L.C. and others
Lumpkin v. Kaufman County Jail
as 3:2021cv01842
Plaintiff:
Kiriath Lumpkin
Defendant:
Kaufman Couty Jail, Kaufman County Jail, Kaufman County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Vannoy et al
as 2:2020cv02484
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
