Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Colyer v. County of Mifflin et al
as 3:2021cv01117
Defendant:
Kurtz, Unknown Medical Providers John Does 1-10, Beaver and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas T. Colyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colyer v. County of Mifflin et al
as 2:2021cv02739
Defendant:
CO Angela Jones, CO Kurtz, Unknown Correctional Officers John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas T. Colyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv02057
Defendant:
MICHAEL BURKE, MANUEL SANTIAGO, THE ESTATE OF CHARLES PERMINT and others
Plaintiff:
THEOPHALIS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Reid v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00097
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe #1-1, Unit Counselor McBride, T. Millard and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Michael Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv04460
Defendant:
MR. J. HALL, MR. WILLIAMS, III, MR. S. SWARY and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN T. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2019cv00303
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIKE POMPEO and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROE v. SUPERINTENDENT OF STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, MUNCY, PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv00056
Petitioner:
LANA KAY ROE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, MUNCY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00672
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. ROE, etal
as 2:2017mc00668
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. SONG, et al
as 2:2017mc00670
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
