Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bradley v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08781
Plaintiff:
Roger Bradley
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bradley v. Washington et al
as 5:2020cv01264
Plaintiff:
Roger Bradley
Defendant:
Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company, Louis Washington and C&L Investment Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. Integrated Community Services of Parkersburg, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00506
Defendant:
Integrated Community Services of Parkersburg, Inc. and Roger Bradley
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bradley v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01813
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dave Rogers Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1982
Bradley v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv09773
Plaintiff:
Pearlene Rogers Bradley
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sharpe v. Hendricks et al
as 2:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Benny Sharpe, Jr.
Defendant:
Joe W. Hendricks, Jr. and Roger Bradley
Sharpe v. Bradley et al
as 4:2009cv00154
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Benny Sharpe, Jr.
Defendant:
Roger Bradley and Joe W. Hendricks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
