Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Nash v. Crow
as 23-7034
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROGER DANIEL NASH
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Director
Brown v. Griggs et al
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Mikel Brown and Mikel Ray Brown
Defendant:
Darrell Griggs, Seth Dalton, Greg Holley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nash v. Bowen
as 6:2020cv00406
Petitioner:
Roger Nash and Roger Daniel Nash
Respondent:
Mark Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2019cv00909
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Roger Daniel Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniel Jr v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04087
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Roger Daniel Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthew Howell v. NCCU
as 17-1798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW HOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY, DEBRA SAUNDERS-WHITE, GREG MARROW and others
Defendant:
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROGER DANIELS, HARRY MONDS and others
HOWELL v. NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2016cv00576
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOWELL
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY , BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA , DEBRA SAUNDERS-WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Essex v. U.S. Marshal Service for the Eastern District of Kentucky et al.
as 5:2015cv00279
Plaintiff:
John Michael Essex
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service for the Eastern District of Kentucky , Roger Daniel , Jacob M. Frick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Isaacs v. Levine et al
as 1:2013cv01565
Plaintiff:
Anna F Isaacs
Defendant:
Paula Levine, Paul Segal, Brian E Manion and others
Cause Of Action: Mortgage Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
