Cases 1 - 10 of 531
Johnson v. Coffee et al
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Lee Vester Coffee, Aurthur Thomas Bennett, Gwendolyn Rooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Walker
as 4:2018cv04182
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Jr
Plaintiff:
James D Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Walker et al
as 1:2017cv01470
Plaintiff:
Jared W Williams
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Roberta Fews, Wendy . Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffey v. Walker et al
as 1:2015cv01369
Plaintiff:
Ernest Coffey
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Jr, Roberta Fews, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Munson v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 14-3431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MUNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, DONALD GAETZ, Warden/Administrative Officer, Menard Correctional Center, ROGER E. WALKER, JR., Director, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Larry Hayes v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 14-1858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY C. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., SHERRY HILE, DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and others
Titus Linton v. Michael Randle, et al
as 14-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITUS V. LINTON, also known as TUTANKHAMEEN AL-JIHAD AL-SHAYKH AL-JABAL IBN JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. RANDLE, EDDIE JONES, Warden, GUY PIERCE and others
Craig Childress v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 14-1204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG A. CHILDRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., Director of Illinois Department of Corrections, JOHN EVANS, Warden, ROBERT HILLIARD, Warden and others
Mounson v. Walker et al
as 3:2013cv01192
Plaintiff:
Henry Mounson
Defendant:
Roger E. Walker, Jr., Robert S. Frey, Terry L McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plummer v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv08253
Plaintiff:
Edward Plummer
Defendant:
S. A. Godinez, Howard A Peters, Odie Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
