Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Mares et al v. National Treasury Employees Union, Chapter 160 et al
as 1:2025cv00069
Plaintiff:
Rosa Mares, Gustavo E. Acosta, Sandra Marquez and others
Defendant:
National Treasury Employees Union, Chapter 160 and Robert Briseno
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Garza v. Bullet Express, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Rolando Garza
Defendant:
Bullet Express, LLC and Vitali Shteinberh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
GARZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67741
Plaintiff:
ROLANDO GARZA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza et al v. Femco, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00287
Plaintiff:
Nicolas R Garza, Rolando Garza, Consuelo C Garza and others
Defendant:
Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc., Scag Power Equipment, Femco, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2018cv00393
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Richard Rolando Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arenas et al v. Sandford Oil Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00562
Plaintiff:
Ashland Arenas , Jason Villareal , Cedric Camp and others
Defendant:
Western Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Case name not on file
as 7:2017cv00264
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00254
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consol_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
USA v. Erick Garza-Castaneda
as 16-11743
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERICK ROLANDO GARZA-CASTANEDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
