Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Novak v. Thorne et al
as 3:2025cv00261
Defendant:
Rebecca Fischer, Jeffery L Thorne, Ron Heeg and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Albert Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant v. Heeg et al
as 3:2025cv00151
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L Grant
Defendant:
Ron Heeg, Hilderbent and Maksyan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niedbalski v. LaPorte County Sheriff Department
as 3:2025cv00130
Defendant:
Laporte County Sheriff Department, Ron Heeg, Joseph Maksyan and others
Plaintiff:
Lucas A Niedbalski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Heeg et al
as 3:2025cv00058
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Simmons
Defendant:
Ron Heeg, Hanha and Hilderbent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kampf v. Heeg et al
as 3:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Robert Kampf
Defendant:
Ron Heeg and Quality Correctional Care LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tweedy v. Heeg et al
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Blake Tweedy
Defendant:
Ron Heeg and Quality Correctional Care LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young-El v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Young-El and Jermaine Young
Defendant:
Oliver and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niedbalski v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Lucas A. Niedbalski
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niedbalski v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Lucas A. Niedbalski
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Heeg et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lopez and Antonio Luis Miguel Lopez
Defendant:
Ron Heeg, Quality Correctional Care, LLC, Cheryl Strahle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
