Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Williams v. Lawson, et al.
as 24-7482
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, MICHAEL MAINES, JR., JOHN DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS WILLIAMS
Hayes v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as PAE/2:24-cv-03539
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hayes
Hayes v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv03539
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hayes
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ESTATE OF CINDY HAYES et al v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01793
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF CINDY HAYES and RONALD HAYES
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hayes et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2022cv01609
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hayes, Jeramiah Arnold-Fowlkes and Prince-Amahyza Hudson
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Giblin v. Hayes

as 3:2022cv05599
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Paul Giblin
Respondent:
Ronald Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rogers v. Hayes

as 3:2022cv05367
Petitioner:
Daryl Rogers and Daryl Craig Rogers
Respondent:
Ronald Hayes and Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCAIN v. NORMAN et al
as 1:2022cv02039
Plaintiff:
SANDRA MCCAIN
Defendant:
TIMOTHY NORMAN, RONALD HAYES and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.