Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Davis-Bey v. Pooler et al
as 1:2020cv24967
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, Judge Teresa Pooler and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davis-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Ronald Davis
as 19-6481
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD E. DAVIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davis v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv16514
Defendant:
WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES COMPANY, TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS INC., ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davis
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04795
Defendant:
Wyeth LLC f/k/a Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, Merck& Co., Inc. d/b/a Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. CIR
as 19-9001
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD E. DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Davis v. State of Missouri
as 2:2017cv02210
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davis
Defendant:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. State of California et al
as 2:2017cv02125
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davis
Defendant:
State of California, California Franchise Tax Board and California State Agency Insurer
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Bank of America et al
as 2:2016cv02506
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davis
Defendant:
Bank of America , Franchise Tax Board , Bank of America National Board of Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
