Cases filed in Delaware
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Emrit et al v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant: The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Emrit v. United States Embassy of Poland et al
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535; also known as (aka) Ronald Satish Emrit, & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America and (aka) Ronald Satish Emrit, & Presidential Committee
Defendant: United States Embassy of Poland, Embassy of Poland in the United States, State Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Emrit et al v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant: Hon. John Roberts, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Justice Samuel Alito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Emrit v. United States Embassy of Poland et al
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant: United States Embassy of Poland, Embassy of Poland in the United States, State Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emrit v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant: The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Emrit v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv00289
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant: Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Justice Samuel Alito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emrit v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00291
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant: President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, The White House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Emrit v. Rubio et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant: Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Rick Scott, Senator Chris Coons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Emrit v. University of Virginia Darden School of Business et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00403
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Adams & Garth, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?