Cases 11 - 20 of 122
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 6:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P.Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 4:2024cv00110
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Petitioner:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 3:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv02085
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean "P. Diddy" Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 5:2024cv05056
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Emrit v. Combs et al.
as 1:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs
as 24-1195
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN JOHN COMBS, a/k/a P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
P Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv10566
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
