Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Emrit v. FNU LNU, Special Agent
as 23-1207
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
LNU FNU, Special Agent in charge of FBI Field Office in Southern District of New York (SDNY) and FNU LNU, Special Agent in charge of FBI Field Office in Southern District of New York (SDNY)
Emrit v. Special Agent in Charge of FBI Field Office
as 22-1955
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Respondent / Appellee:
SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE IN SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (SDNY)
Emrit v. FBI
as 3:2022cv30154
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Emrit v. LNU
as 1:2022cv00517
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Emrit v. Yale University
as 3:2022cv30151
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Yale University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Emrit v. Russell Trust Association
as 3:2022cv30150
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Russell Trust Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EMRIT v. SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE
as 1:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 3:2020cv30018
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Emrit v. Soros et al
as 4:2019cv40006
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission, Securities Exchange Commission, George Soros and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Emrit v. Trump et al
as 4:2019cv40005
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Commerce, Federal Trade Commission, President Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
