Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Emrit v. Jules
as 2:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 2:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Texas Bar, Texas Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Emrit v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement et al
as 2:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Broward County State Attorney's Office, City of Fort Lauderdale Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Emrit v. Barkley et al
as 1:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emit and Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Charles Barkley, Subway, Fandvel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Emrit v. Barkley et al
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Charles Barkley, Subway and Fanduel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Emrit v. Barkley et al
as 2:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Charles Barkley, Subway and Fanduel Sporting Goods
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Emrit v. Rice et al
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emit and Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Condoleeza Rice and Antony Blinkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Emrit v. Beasley Allen, P.C. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00649
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Beasley Allen, P.C., Davis & Crump, P.C. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
