Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Schwartz v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv13092
Plaintiff:
Ronald Schwartz
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Pastuh, et al v. Yahoo! Inc., et al
as 20-17438
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HOWES, CRAIG WALQUIST, DATO MIO and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: YAHOO! INC. CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
Defendant / Appellee:
AABACO SMALL BUSINESS, LLC and YAHOO! INC.
Appellant:
PASTUH
Rufus Spearman v. Mary Parson, et al
as 20-1913
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] HARRISON, CASE MANAGER KRETZ, PSYCHOLOGIST MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN
In re: Ronald Schwartz, et al v. Yahoo! Inc., et al
as 20-16779
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAADYA KAUFMANN, REUVEN NATHANSON, JENNIFER J. MYERS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AABACO SMALL BUSINESS, LLC and YAHOO! INC.
Appellant:
JAMES MCCAIN
Not Classified By Court:
In re: YAHOO! INC. CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
In re: Ronald Schwartz, et al v. Yahoo! Inc., et al
as 20-16633
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAADYA KAUFMANN, REUVEN NATHANSON, JENNIFER J. MYERS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AABACO SMALL BUSINESS, LLC and YAHOO! INC.
Not Classified By Court:
In re: YAHOO! INC. CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
Appellant:
AARON MILLER
Spearman v. Parson et al
as 2:2018cv10673
Plaintiff:
Rufus Spearman
Defendant:
Mary Parson, Rick Raymond, Hanna Saad and others
Spearman v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2017cv12805
Plaintiff:
Rufus L. Spearman
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Department of Mental Health, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Schwartz v. Yahoo! Inc.
as 5:2016cv05456
Plaintiff:
Ronald Schwartz and Edward McMahon
Defendant:
Yahoo! Inc.
In Re: Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 5:2016md02752
Plaintiff:
Ronald Schwartz , Edward McMahon , Maria Sventek and others
Defendant:
Yahoo! Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
