Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Parker v. Primm et al
as 4:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Parker
Defendant:
Geron L. Primm and J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mv Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Parker v. McClure et al
as 3:2023cv00068
Petitioner:
Ronnie Parker
Respondent:
Marc McClure and Mississippi Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PARKER et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
RONNIE PARKER and AMY PARKER
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv33011
Plaintiff:
RONNIE PARKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv25709
Plaintiff:
RONNIE PARKER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Daniels et al
as 1:2011cv00339
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Parker
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Luther Strange, Judge Shurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00397
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Parker
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Luther Strange, Judge Shurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker et al v Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2008cv06528
Plaintiff:
Roger Barker, Roger Barker, Roger Barker and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic International Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Barker et al v Medtronic, Inc.
as 3:2008cv05120
Plaintiff:
Roger Barker, Roger Barker, Roger Barker and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic International Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
