Cases 1 - 10 of 22
United States of America v. Robinson
as 23-7913
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONNIE ROBINSON
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Robinson and Ronnie Robinson, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv82352
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONNIE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv62386
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONNIE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00252
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Robinson v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 6:2018cv00283
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Robinson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC , Peggy Wadman , Chantell Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Texas Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2017cv00898
Defendant:
Estevan Cortez, William Fuller, Casey Rowe and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Robinson v. Texas Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2017cv01031
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Robinson
Defendant:
Texas Department of Transportation, Casey Rowe, Estevan Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
