Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kirby v. Murray et al
as 3:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kaishau Lashaae Kirby
Defendant:
Joshua Murray , Kevin Ables , Santos Berumen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Blytheville Police Department et al
as 3:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
Travis Young
Defendant:
Blytheville Police Department, Ross Thompson, Matt Huckabay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. State of Arkansas et al
as 3:2012cv00202
Defendant:
Cindy Thyer, Curtis Walker, Ross Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Stacy L Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Wilson et al
as 3:2012cv00201
Plaintiff:
James C Gregory
Defendant:
Ralph Wilson, Jr , Curtis Walker , Ross Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Thompson et al
as 3:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Nenomoshia Thomas
Defendant:
Ross Thompson , Blytheville Arkansas, City of and Matt Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Gentry et al
as 3:2012cv00013
Defendant:
Cody Gentry, Ross Thompson and Blytheville Arkansas, City of
Plaintiff:
James C Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Gentry et al
as 3:2010cv00300
Plaintiff:
James Gregory
Defendant:
Cody Gentry , Ross Thompson and Blytheville Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. Thompson et al
as 3:2010cv00150
Plaintiff:
Nenomoshia Thomas
Defendant:
Ross Thompson and Blytheville Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry et al v. Thompson et al
as 3:2009cv00183
Plaintiff:
Deanthony Perry and Deon Mouton
Defendant:
Ross Thompson, Janie Battles and Blytheville Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Frye v. Blytheville Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2009cv00150
Plaintiff:
Earnest Frye
Defendant:
Blytheville Arkansas, City of, Barrett Harrison, Shirley Connealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
