Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Afriyie et al v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09433
Plaintiff:
Amma Afriyie and Roy Campbell
Defendant:
NBCUniversal Media, LLC and Peacock TV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 271
CAMPBELL v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23171
Plaintiff:
ROY CAMPBELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAMPBELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv07745
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ROY CAMPBELL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Synchrony Bank
as 3:2018cv00501
Amicus Curiae:
Curtis Neal
Plaintiff:
Roy Campbell
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company Inc., Synchrony Bank and J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv04777
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Chloe S.A.S., Van Cleef & Arpels SA and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Bobbi George, Yiwu Lanhome Jewelry Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Campbell v. Gap, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Roy Campbell
Defendant:
Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Campbell v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Roy Campbell
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company, Inc. and J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Campbell v. Lasalle Corrections Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00110
Defendant:
Lasalle Corrections Corp, Winn Correctional Center, Keith Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
