Cases 1 - 10 of 11
LEE v. ODOM
as 5:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
ROOSEVELT LEE, JR
Respondent:
ROY ODOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Ware County Georgia
as 5:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Chaney Lewis
Defendant:
Ware County Georgia, Ware State Prison and Warden Roy Odom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. State of Georgia et al
as 5:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Chaney Kiree Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Roy Odom and Rigby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Odom et al
as 5:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Bennie James Johnson
Defendant:
Roy Odom, Cert Officer Todman, Cert Officer Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strozier v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Jamal Strozier
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Robert Toole, Stan Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00365
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, PARALEGAL JAMIE A VALLEE, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2018cv00073
Defendant:
Warden Jack Koon, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Lisa Fountain and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
