Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 156
Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago v. Bank of America Corporation
as 24-81
Petitioner: PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT FUND OF CHICAGO, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
Respondent: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and others
McCarthy, et al. v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., et al.
as 23-3458
Plaintiff / Appellant: LISA MCCARTHY, MARY KATHERINE ARCELL, KEITH DEAN BRADT and others
Defendant / Appellee: INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC., INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE HOLDINGS, INC., ICE BENCHMARK ADMINISTRATION LIMITED and others
Defendant: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC and THE NORINCHUKIN BANK
Zaerpour v. Bank of America Corporation
as 23-845
Plaintiff: People of the United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant: Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant / Appellee: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC and others
Zaerpour et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff: Soheil Zaerpour and The People of the United States of America
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank plc and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: UBS Group AG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Zaerpour v. UBS Group AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07232
Plaintiff: Scheil Zaerpour and Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant: UBS Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nypl v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 22-698
Petitioner: Lisa McCarthy, an individual, Mad Travel, Inc., AKA Travel Leaders, Valarie Jolly, an individual and others
Respondent: Bank of America, N.A., JP Morgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corporation and others
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3775
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co., HSBC Holdings PLC, Lloyds Banking Group PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: Societe Generale, Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. and Barclays Bank PLC
Intervenor: California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?