Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Hill v. Loden
as 2:2023cv00135
Plaintiff: Russell K. Hill *DO NOT FILE* and Russell K. Hill
Defendant: Warden C. Loden
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HILL v. UNITED STATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02270
Plaintiff: RUSSELL K. HILL
Defendant: UNITED STATES, INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON BOUNDARIES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill *DO NOT FILE* v. Loden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00293
Petitioner: Russell K. Hill DO NOT FILE and Russell Keith Hill
Defendant: Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Russell HillIn re: Russell Hill
as 22-60665
Petitioner: In re: Russell K. Hill
Hill v. Loden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00184
Petitioner: Russell K. Hill
Respondent: Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hill v. Loden
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff: Russell K. Hill
Defendant: Warden C. Loden
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Loden
as 4:2022cv00159
Petitioner: Russell K. Hill
Respondent: Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Loden
as 22-60413
Petitioner / Appellant: Russell K. Hill
Respondent / Appellee: Chris Loden, Warden
Hill v. Loden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00040
Petitioner: Russell K. Hill
Respondent: Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hill v. US
as 21-1816
Plaintiff / Appellant: RUSSELL K. HILL
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?