Cases 11 - 20 of 54
May v. Licon-Vitali
as 3:2020cv01105
Petitioner:
Russell Thomas May
Respondent:
Marti Licon-Vitali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01453
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45553
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Sullivan et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv00425
Defendant:
Michael T. Bunn, Kelly Barron, Russell Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Michael-Everet Dennison, Jr. and Brandon-Kyle Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell May v. Eric Bradley, et al
as 20-1729
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, J. RICHARDSON, Trust Fund Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
MCCARTHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv35982
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MAY v. BRADLEY
as 3:2020cv00048
Petitioner:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Respondent:
ERIC BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Ameritas Life Insurance Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00741
Defendant:
Ameritas Life Insurance Corporation and Johnny J Alfred
Plaintiff:
Russell Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell Thomas v. Commissioner Delaware Departme, et al
as 19-3365
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BUREAU CHIEF DELAWARE BUREAU OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL THOMAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
