Cases 1 - 5 of 5
USA ex rel., James Doghramji, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 20-5469
Defendant / Appellee:
MARION HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Heartland Regional Medical Center, BIG SPRING HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Scenic Mountain Medical Center, CARLSBAD MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, Carlsbad Medical Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DOGHRAMJI, RACHEL BRYANT and SHEREE COOK
Plaintiff:
AMY COOK-RESKA, NANCY REUILLE, KATHLEEN A. BRYANT and others
USA ex rel., James Doghramji, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 20-5462
Defendant / Appellee:
MARION HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Heartland Regional Medical Center, BIG SPRING HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Scenic Mountain Medical Center, CARLSBAD MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, Carlsbad Medical Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DOGHRAMJI, RACHEL BRYANT and SHEREE COOK
Plaintiff:
AMY COOK-RESKA, NANCY REUILLE, KATHLEEN A. BRYANT and others
USA, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 15-6280
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., JAMES DOGHRAMJI, SHEREE COOK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., CHHS HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC, d/b/a Chestnut Hill Hospital, DYERSBURG HOSPITAL CORPORATION, d/b/a Dyersburg Regional Medical Center and others
USA v. Community Health Systems, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00442
Plaintiff:
United States of America , James Doghramji , Sheree Cook and others
Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc. , Community Health Systems Professional Services , CHHS Hospital Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
USA et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00312
Plaintiff:
USA , State of Illinois , State of California and others
Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc. , Marion Hospital Corporation , CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
