Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hill v. Brittan
as 1:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Ruth Hill
Defendant:
Luke Brittan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hill v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20451
Plaintiff:
Minnie Ruth Hill
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Products, Inc. , DePuy International, Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
High v. ARAMARK Corporation
as 5:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Reba Ruth Hill High
Defendant:
ARAMARK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. West 125th Street Realty Corporation
as 1:2013cv04629
Plaintiff:
Karia Ruth Hill
Defendant:
West 125th Street Realty Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Whitfield et al v. Southern Maryland Hospital, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv02749
Plaintiff:
Holley F. Whitfield and Michael Whitfield
Defendant:
Southern Maryland Hospital, Inc. , Weatherby Locums, Inc. , Edna Ruth Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheryl Hill, et al v. Iberia Parish, et al
as 09-30301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERYL HILL, RUTH HILL, JAMES WALKER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SID HEBERT, JEFF MATTHEWS, ANDRUS GONZALES and others
Hill et al v. Iberia Parish et al
as 6:2007cv01607
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Hill, Ruth Hill, James Walker and others
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office Iberia Parish, Sid Hebert, Jeff Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
