Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ezell v. Cole, et al
as 24-6025
Plaintiff:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant:
DAVID COLE, Warden GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU RUSSELL, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU COOPER, L/T, Ms., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual capacity and others
Ezell v. Cole, et al
as 23-6110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID COLE, Warden GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU RUSSELL, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU ROGERS, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual capacity and others
CHARLES v. PITTMAN et al
as 3:2022cv10106
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MACK CHARLES
Defendant:
P A PITTMAN, S CARROLL, S G MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevis Sistrunk v. S. Mitchell, et al
as 22-10634
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TREVIS TYRELL SISTRUNK
Defendant / Appellee:
S. G. MITCHELL and JANE DOE
SISTRUNK v. MITCHELL et al
as 4:2021cv00087
Defendant:
JANE DOE and S G MITCHELL
Plaintiff:
TREVIS TYRELL SISTRUNK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00108
Defendant:
Warden S. G. Wellhausen, Charles Cook, Corizon Corporate Headquarters and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lieture Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justin Cote-Stokes v. S.G. Satterthwaite
as 14-7885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN COTE-STOKES
Defendant - Appellee:
S. G. SATTERTHWAITE, Norfolk Deputy
Cote-Stokes v. Satterthwaite
as 1:2014cv01039
Plaintiff:
Justin Cote-Stokes
Defendant:
S. G. Satterthwaite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOAN v. COUTTS et al
as 3:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
R. COUTTS, J. J. SOSSON, T. FULTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayne Beaton v. Jessica Valverde, et al
as 12-11265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE M. BEATON
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSICA D. VALVERDE, Correctional Officer, C. L. BASHORE, Sergeant, J. D. EDWARDS, Classification Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
