Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tejada v. Renington et al
as 1:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tejada
Defendant:
Correctional Officer J. Renington, Correctional Officer Jaelise Ballestas, Correctional Officer Brandon S. Joiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pughsley v. Lucern et al
as 3:2018cv50306
Defendant:
J. Maher, Lucern, S. Joiner and others
Plaintiff:
Roy K. Pughsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pughsley v. Lucern et al
as 3:2018cv50301
Defendant:
J. Maher, S. Joiner, Rochelle Briney and others
Plaintiff:
Roy K. Pughsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burl v. Embrace Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv12092
Plaintiff:
Linia M. Burl
Defendant:
Embrace Home Loans, Inc., Round Point Mortgage Servicing Corporation, Lakeview Loans Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Bakalik v. Quinn et al
as 1:2014cv05510
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Bakalik
Defendant:
Pat Quinn, Salvador Godinez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOINER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00583
Petitioner:
ROBERT S JOINER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
Joiner et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012dp20594
Plaintiff:
Bayard S. Joiner and Jane P. Joiner
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joiner et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as OHN/1:12-dp-20594
Plaintiff:
Bayard S. Joiner and Jane P. Joiner
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson International and others
Joiner v. Gay et al
as 2:2010cv02349
Plaintiff:
Marvin S Joiner
Defendant:
John Gay, Ben Rowlings, Rick Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casas v. U S Joiner et al
as 1:2008cv00127
Plaintiff:
George Casas
Defendant:
U S Joiner and Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
