Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Francis Brooks v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-6821
Defendant / Appellee: JANELLE WILLIAMS, Psychiatrist, S. HOLLEMBAEK, Warden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-100 and ALEX SEDA, Medical Doctor
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANCIS BROOKS
Roudabush v. Hollembaek et al
as 5:2018ct03104
Plaintiff: James L. Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant: S. Hollembaek, S. Butler, Lt. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROUDABUSH v. HOLLEMBAEK et al
as 1:2018cv00014
Plaintiff: JAMES L. ROUDABUSH
Defendant: S. HOLLEMBAEK, SINGLETON, LASSITER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Asmar Newsome v. S. Hollembaek
as 16-7761
Plaintiff - Appellant: ASMAR NAFIS NEWSOME
Defendant - Appellee: S. HOLLEMBAEK and OFFICER SOMERVILLE
Edward Dane Jeffus v. S. Hollembaek We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-7659
Petitioner - Appellant: EDWARD DANE JEFFUS
Respondent - Appellee: S. HOLLEMBAEK
Mangum v. Hollembaek et al
as 5:2016hc02293
Petitioner: Anthony Wayne Mangum
Respondent: S. Hollembaek, Charles E. Samuels and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Heromin v. Warden, Butner Low Security Correctional Institution
as 5:2016ct03304
Plaintiff: Ronald John Heromin
Defendant: Warden, Butner Low Security Correctional Institution, S. Hollembaek, Mr. Hiscocks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edward Dane Jeffus v. S. Hollembaek We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-7154
Petitioner - Appellant: EDWARD DANE JEFFUS
Respondent - Appellee: S. HOLLEMBAEK
Brooks v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016ct03166
Plaintiff: Francis Brooks
Defendant: United States of America, Gerri Levister, S. Hollembaek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newsome v. Hollembaek
as 5:2016ct03091
Plaintiff: Asmar Nafis Newsome
Defendant: S. Hollembaek and Officer Somerville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?