Cases 1 - 10 of 86
King et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Cecil Roy King and Valerie Hunter King
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Pricilla Almodovar, PHH Mortgage Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
In Re: Hughes
as 23-8029
Respondent:
PAUL S. HUGHES
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Andrew Chien v. Edward Robbins, Jr.
as 22-1004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW CHIEN
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD ANSON ROBBINS, JR., FREDERICK G. ROCKWELL, III, WENDY S. HUGHES and others
Hughes-Lancaster v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00447
Plaintiff:
Tammi S. Hughes-Lancaster
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Chien v. Robbins et al
as 3:2021cv00121
Defendant:
Frederick G. Rockwell, III, Karl S. Leonard, Wendy S. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Hughes v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00072
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Sonya S. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Mellon et al v. Islamic Republic Of Iran
as 1:2019cv11767
Plaintiff:
Craig Centro, Harold Hughes, Rosemarie Maggiore and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic Of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
HUGHES v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv04997
Defendant:
SEVERE, DOES 1-100, STACIE SCOTT and others
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denton v. Danko Meredith et al
as 3:2019cv01365
Plaintiff:
Roger C. Denton and Roger C Denton
Defendant:
Kristine K Meredith, Dylan S Hughes, Danko Meredith and others
Interested Party:
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hommel v. Unknown, et al
as 7:2019cv00469
Respondent:
S. Hughes Melton, Mark Herring, Jason Wilson and others
Petitioner:
Brandon K. Hommel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
