Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Reno Rios v. Connie Gipson, et al
as 21-16652
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENO FUENTES RIOS
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, T. CAMPBELL, Captain, A. V. JOHNSON, Lieutenant and others
Gila River Indian Community v. 99 Ranch LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00103
Defendant:
M N LLC, Richard M Kaler, Francisco R Serna and others
Plaintiff:
Gila River Indian Community
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edward Jordan v. Dr. Ben Lee et al
as 2:2019cv05182
Defendant:
S. Pina, Dr. C Bingham DDS, D. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruben Valdez v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 19-15142
Defendant / Appellee:
OLIVEIRA, A. PACILLAS, Correctional Counselor, A. LACKOVIC, Dr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
Ruben Valdez v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 16-16765
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections, R. S. LAMBERT, Chief Deputy Warden, J. MAHONEY, Psy. D and others
Soriano v. Davies et al
as 1:2015cv01271
Plaintiff:
Leon M. Soriano
Defendant:
Dave Davies, T. Perez, S. Pina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saavedra v. Harrington et al
as 2:2015cv00898
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Saavedra
Defendant:
Kelly Harrington, J. Robertson, Michael Ruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Saavedra v. USDC-CAFR
as 14-72411
:
In re: MICHAEL ANTHONY SAAVEDRA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANTHONY SAAVEDRA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
SCOTT KERNAN, ANTHONY CHAUS, DOUGLAS MCCLURE and others
Hollins v. Lozano, et al.
as 2:2014cv00964
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Hollins
Defendant:
J. D. Lozano, S. Pina, S. Niehus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reno Rios v. Gipson et al
as 1:2014cv00520
Plaintiff:
Reno Rios
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, T. Campbell, A.V. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.