Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 133
Roberto Herrera v. CDCR Staff, et al
as 23-55515
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERTO HERRERA
Respondent / Appellee: CDCR STAFF and S. SHERMAN
Roberto Herrera v. CDCR Staff et al
as 2:2023cv03103
Petitioner: Roberto Herrera
Respondent: CDCR Staff and S. Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper v. Collins et al
as 2:2022at00435
Plaintiff: Jason S. Harper
Defendant: J. Collins, D. Williams, J. Cisneros-Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Evans v. R. Milam, et al
as 22-15351
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD A. EVANS
Defendant / Appellee: R. MILAM, Plant Operations at SATF, LEFFMAN and S. SHERMAN, Warden at SATF
Richard Evans v. R. Milam, et al
as 21-16493
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD A. EVANS
Defendant / Appellee: R. MILAM, Plant Operations at SATF, LEFFMAN and S. SHERMAN, Warden at SATF
Rafael Ferguson v. S. Sherman, et al
as 21-16359
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAFAEL FERGUSON
Defendant / Appellee: S. SHERMAN, Warden at CSATF, E. GUZMAN, C. DE LA CRUZ, CCI at CSATF and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-55763
Petitioner / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daronta Lewis v. Connie Gipson, et al
as 21-15663
Defendant / Appellee: RALPH DIAZ, S. SHERMAN, NIKKI JOHNSON, Transport officer, SATF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DARONTA TYRONE LEWIS
Richard Evans v. S. Sherman, et al
as 21-15177
Defendant / Appellee: T. CISNEROS, Chief Deputy Warden, FIGEROA, E-Yard Librarian, J. OURIQUE, E-Yard Captain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD A. EVANS
(PC) Ferguson v. Sherman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00116
Defendant: S. Sherman, E. Guzman, J. Moreno and others
Plaintiff: Rafael Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?