Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Sims v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07126
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Sims
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sims v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05691
Plaintiff:
Tiwon S. Sims
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Officer Brandon Neita-Scott, Star No. 18908 and Officer Victor Alcazar, Star No. 11046
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Uduji et al
as 7:2021cv00040
Defendant:
LaVonda J. McLemore, Leslie S. Sims, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James Earvin Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Bessemer Police Dept et al
as 2:2020cv01913
Defendant:
OFC Brent A Miller, Magistrate Maurice Muhammad, Scott Roebuck and others
Plaintiff:
Angelik S. Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Sims et al
as 2:2020cv01129
Defendant:
Homewood Police Department, Victor M. Sims, II, Jefferson County Magistrate Office and others
Plaintiff:
Angelik S. Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRATCHER v. MIXON et al
as 5:2019cv00121
Defendant:
DOH CENTRAL PHARMACY, S MIXON, A SCOGGINS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH W BRATCHER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. TT Express, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00085
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. Sims
Defendant:
TT Express, LLC , Eric T. Browning , E.T.C. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sims vs. United States
as 2:2017cv01930
Plaintiff:
Evelyn S. Sims
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Sims v. Travelers
as 3:2016cv00712
Plaintiff:
Gail S. Sims
Defendant:
Travelers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Sims et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05307
Plaintiff:
Craig R. Sims , Robert A. Sims and Tammy S. Sims
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and BP PLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
