Cases 11 - 20 of 121
RUTHRAUFF v. CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Defendant:
SARA BEDWELL, CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC., STEPHANY LYNNE RILEY and others
Plaintiff:
MARK RUTHRAUFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLLIVER v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
THEOTIS D. TOLLIVER
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARON-STOREY v. BYRD
as 1:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
ANSHIOUS B.D. ARON-STOREY
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN MARSHALL
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, MAKAYLA, HEATHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
EARL MARTIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, CASEY CAMBEL, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinley Kelly v. Michael Mitcheff, et al
as 24-1157
Plaintiff:
MCKINLEY KELLY
Defendant:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor, SAMUEL BYRD, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
DUNN v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DUNN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC, NAVEEN RAJOLI, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUFORD v. BYRD
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON LEE BUFORD
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALLANTINE v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY W. CALLANTINE
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, ELIZABETH BENNETT, SAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GALINDO v. CENTURION, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
MARCO GALINDO
Defendant:
CENTURION, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
